Samuel Cutfield, Katherine Ember, Clinton Turner, Jason Correia, Kevin Petrecca, Michel Nieuwoudt, Michael Dragunow, Claude Aguergaray, Frédéric Leblond
While multicenter studies support the analytic validity of Raman-based tissue detection, clinical adoption requires prospective outcome trials, standardized acquisition protocols, and regulatory advancement.
SIGNIFICANCE: Maximizing brain tumor resection while preserving neurological function remains a neurosurgical challenge. Current intraoperative tools, including MRI, ultrasound, and frozen section, disrupt workflow and provide limited real-time molecular information.
AIM: This review synthesizes evidence for Raman spectroscopy as an intraoperative tool in glioma and brain metastasis surgery, comparing it against established alternatives and framing findings within a diagnostic hierarchy from analytic validity through clinical utility to outcome benefit.
APPROACH: Evidence is arranged by surgical setting: in vivo handheld fiber-optic probes and ex vivo platforms including Raman microscopy, stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) imaging, and visible resonance Raman.
RESULTS: In vivo multicenter studies report > 85 % per-measurement sensitivity and specificity for tumor versus normal classification, with nondestructive analysis in ∼ 2 s . Molecular marker detection, including IDH mutation status, has been demonstrated predominantly ex vivo. Ex vivo SRS generates histology-quality images and can classify selected molecular alterations within ∼ 90 s , though this molecular capability is not clinically validated.
CONCLUSIONS: While multicenter studies support the analytic validity of Raman-based tissue detection, clinical adoption requires prospective outcome trials, standardized acquisition protocols, and regulatory advancement.