Mauricio Barramuño-Medina, Pablo Valdés-Badilla, Pablo Aravena-Sagardia, Jordan Hernandez-Martínez, Edgar Vásquez-Carrasco, Wilson Pastén-Hidalgo, Cristian Sandoval-Vásquez, Germán Gálvez-García
This study analyzed whether wearable inertial sensors could detect exercise-induced mobility changes and compared the effects of multicomponent training (MCT) and elastic band training (EBT) on mobility and physical function in older women.
Wearable inertial sensors have become tools for objectively assessing mobility in older people. This study analyzed whether wearable inertial sensors could detect exercise-induced mobility changes and compared the effects of multicomponent training (MCT) and elastic band training (EBT) on mobility and physical function in older women. Forty-two participants were randomly allocated to either the MCT (n = 21) or EBT (n = 21) group, where 38 (EBT: n = 19; MCT: n = 19) completed the 16-week intervention. Outcomes included instrumented Timed Up-and-Go (iTUG) assessed with a wearable inertial sensor, the Senior Fitness Test, maximal isometric handgrip strength, conventional TUG, anthropometric measurements, health-related quality of life, and blood biomarkers. Data were analyzed using age-adjusted linear mixed-effects models. The iTUG showed shorter completion time (p < 0.001), reduced middle-turn duration (p = 0.004), and increased cadence (p = 0.007). Significant time effects were also observed for chair stand (p = 0.011), arm curl (p < 0.001), and conventional TUG (p = 0.009). No significant group × time interactions were detected. After adjustment for multiple comparisons, no significant changes were observed in anthropometric measures, health-related quality of life, or blood biomarkers. Wearable inertial sensors detected training-related mobility changes, and both exercise programs improved physical function and mobility without between-group differences.