Roberto Bava, Rosa Maria Bulotta, Fabio Castagna, Stefano Ruga, Carmine Lupia, Filomena Conforti, Giancarlo Statti, Rosalia Crupi, Vincenzo Musella, Ernesto Palma
Background: The control of fleas and ticks in companion animals is a persistent challenge with animal welfare and public health implications. The increasing resistance to antiparasitic treatments, coupled with concerns over the environmental impact and non-target effects of synthetic acaricides, has driven interest in sustainable alternatives. Essential oils (EOs) have emerged as potential candidates due to their complex chemistry and modes of action. Methods: This review critically analyzes the scientific literature on essential oils for ectoparasite control in companion animals. Specifically, it examines their chemical composition, multi-target mechanisms of action, laboratory and field efficacy, role in resistance mitigation, and integration into IPM strategies. Results: Several EOs, particularly those rich in phenolic compounds (thymol, carvacrol, eugenol, and cinnamaldehyde), demonstrate promising in vitro insecticidal and acaricidal activity. Their multi-target mechanisms, affecting neuronal, respiratory, and cuticular functions, not only provide efficacy but also represent a significant barrier to rapid resistance development. However, their translation to reliable field performance is hampered by high volatility, formulation instability, and innate variability. Conclusions: EOs represent a valuable source of bioactive compounds for reducing reliance on conventional acaricides and can play a key role within IPM strategies. To realize their full potential in mitigating resistance, focused advancements are needed in standardized testing, formulation science to enhance stability and residual activity, and rigorous field studies to confirm safety and efficacy.