How Does Public Leadership Affect Collective Action of Participatory Irrigation Management?

Collective action serves as a critical mechanism for addressing deficiencies in small-scale irrigation infrastructure and fostering a virtuous cycle of their operation and maintenance. Village leaders, as central figures in organizing and mobilizing farmers toward collective action, play a pivotal role in shaping participatory irrigation management (PIM) outcomes through their public leadership. Drawing on micro-survey data from 723 farm households across Ningxia, Shanxi, and Shandong provinces in China’s Yellow River basin, this study employed a multi-group structural equation model (SEM) to analyze the impact of public leadership on collective action in PIM. The findings indicate that: (1) public leadership is directly associated with collective action, with a direct effect of 0.530; (2) public leadership indirectly enhances collective action through mediating variables—cadre–mass relationship, institutional trust, and grassroots democracy—with an indirect effect of 0.045; and (3) the personal characteristics of village leaders moderate the influence of public leadership on collective action. Specifically, public leadership exerts a strong effect when leaders belong to the village elite, possess a least a high school education, or are not members of the village’s major clan. These insights suggest that policymakers should explicitly consider public leadership in fostering collective action within the PIM framework.