Qin Deng, Rong Wang, Hongbin Qi, Yongjin Zhou, Jiaju Chen, Lei Zhang, Xiaoqiang Gao, Xiangren Jin, Zhiqiang Yan, Haibin Wang, Qian Wang, Hongxin Yang
For stage III GC patients with high expression of VEGFR-2 mRNA, SOX + apatinib therapy could improve DFS and OS and had an acceptable safety. Thus, apatinib may potentially become another targeted drug in postoperative stage III GC patients. However, future large-scale randomized clinical trials are still needed for further verification.
BACKGROUND: The S-1 combined with oxaliplatin (SOX) regimen is the standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for stage III gastric cancer (GC) in China, yet 5-year survival remains only 30-40%, partly due to marked tumor heterogeneity. Apatinib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) inhibitor, has shown significant efficacy in unresectable or metastatic GC and the neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced GC, with response positively correlated with VEGFR-2 expression. However, SOX + apatinib has not been evaluated as an adjuvant treatment regimen in postoperative stage III GC patients with high VEGFR-2 expression. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SOX + apatinib in postoperative stage III GC patients with high VEGFR-2 messenger RNA (mRNA)expression.
METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, data of 112 postoperative stage III GC patients with high VEGFR-2 mRNA expression treated at The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University between January 2015 and June 2021 were analyzed. Patients received six 21-day cycles of adjuvant SOX alone (n=55) or SOX + apatinib (n=57), according to whether oral apatinib was administered. Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and safety were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: High VEGFR-2 mRNA expression was detected in 30.8% of stage III GC patients. All 112 patients had complete follow-up records, and the follow-up time was 59.3±24.2 months (range, 13-115 months). The 3-year DFS of the SOX group vs. the SOX + apatinib group was 41.8% vs. 70.2%, P=0.002; the 5-year DFS was 32.1% vs. 62.5%, P=0.002; the 3-year OS was 74.5% vs. 86.0%, P=0.13; and the 5-year OS was 34.0% vs. 64.6%, P=0.002. Univariate survival analysis and Multivariate Cox analyses both identified Borrmann classification, pathologic nodal (pN) stage, and postoperative regimen as independent predictors of DFS and OS. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly improved DFS and OS with SOX + apatinib compared with SOX alone (both P<0.001). Toxicities were predominantly grade I-II and did not differ significantly between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: For stage III GC patients with high expression of VEGFR-2 mRNA, SOX + apatinib therapy could improve DFS and OS and had an acceptable safety. Thus, apatinib may potentially become another targeted drug in postoperative stage III GC patients. However, future large-scale randomized clinical trials are still needed for further verification.