Yuliia Lozko, Andriy Beznosenko, Natalka Suchowerska, Viktor Iakovenko, Ruslan Zelinskyi, Zoia Shepil, Serhii Brovchuk, Roman Kowalchuk, Eric Ford, Ben Li, Jonathan Strauss, Indra J. Das, Jan Seuntjens, Rebecca K. S. Wong, Dylan Breiktreutz, Stephen Avery, Akila N. Viswanathan, Trent Aland, Ross Koscharsky, Anthony Walsh, Allen Chen, Daniel T. Chang, Quynh-Thu Le, Nataliya Kovalchuk
Objective: This study evaluates the impact of international observerships organized by Help Ukraine Group (HUG) on professional development, knowledge transfer, and clinical practice improvement in radiation oncology in Ukraine. Methods: A total of 50 observerships were facilitated for Ukrainian medical professionals at 14 institutions across the USA, Canada, Europe, and Australia from 2022 to 2024, including 31 radiation oncologists and medical physicists. A survey assessed their impact on oncology care, focusing on knowledge gained, lessons learned, and challenges in implementing new techniques. The primary outcome was the success score, defined as a composite score of implementing new procedures, initiating improvement projects, and knowledge dissemination efforts. Descriptive and comparative analyses examined satisfaction and success outcomes. Results: A total of 43 respondents participated in the survey (response rate 86.0%). Twenty-eight of the responders were radiation oncology professionals (67.8% radiation oncologists, 32.1% medical physicists). The median observership duration for radiation oncology professionals was four weeks, with 96.4% also attending a professional conference. Overall satisfaction was high (mean 9.5 out of 10, median 10.0, IQR 9.0-10.0) while the success score was substantial (mean 6.1 out of 10, median 7.0, IQR 5.0-8.0). Time since certification influenced success, with ≥10 years' experience associated with higher success scores (7.4 vs. 4.7, p=0.01). Importantly, 100% of respondents learned new procedures, 89.3% reported shifts in their clinical perspective, and 60.7% successfully implemented new techniques. Subsequent knowledge dissemination in Ukraine was substantial: 82.1% provided informal training, 60.7% delivered institutional or national presentations, 39.3% incorporated materials into lectures, and 10.7% engaged in all activities. Continued mentorship with host institutions was reported by 82.1%. Conclusions: Amid the war, international observerships advanced clinical practice, education, and procedures in Ukraine, demonstrating the resilience of its medical community and providing a model that other LMICs/UMICs can follow.