科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Infection and drug resistance2026-01-01

Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Susceptibility in ESBL-Producing Enterobacterales: Insights from the SMART Program 2020-2022 in China.

Yanfei Wang, Yuke Zhang, Jingjing Quan, Ying Fu, Zhihui Zhou, Jiaqi Xia, Yunsong Yu

一句话结论 · In one sentence

C/T susceptibility among ESBL-E was high in E. coli but substantially lower and more variable in K. pneumoniae and E. cloacae; the aggregate order-level susceptibility of 83.1% should not be relied upon to guide empiric therapy when Klebsiella or Enterobacter infection is suspected. Continued surveillance and susceptibility testing are essential to support evidence-based antimicrobial use.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
PURPOSE: Surveillance data on ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) activity against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) in China remains limited. This study summarized species- and source-specific C/T susceptibility patterns using isolates collected through the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) China program (2020-2022). METHODS: Non-duplicate Enterobacterales isolates from bloodstream, intra-abdominal, respiratory, and urinary tract infections (BSI, IAI, RTI, UTI) were collected in 18 tertiary hospitals. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by broth microdilution and interpreted using CLSI M100 2025. ESBL-E were defined as ceftriaxone-nonsusceptible (i.e, intermediate or resistant) and carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacterales (CSE), with species-specific adjustments for Morganella, Proteus, and Providencia; carbapenem-resistant isolates were analyzed separately. Annual rate was analyzed to reveal the resistance trend from 2020 to 2022. RESULTS: All Enterobacterales isolates meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed; isolation rate is reported by species for the seven most prevalent, which together comprised 93.5% of isolates; the remaining genera contributed to the aggregate totals. Overall susceptibility of Enterobacterales to C/T was high. Among CSE, susceptibility was 92.2%, with 83.1% in ESBL‑E. By infection site, C/T susceptibility among ESBL‑E was 88.3% in UTI, 85.3% in BSI, 79.9% in RTI, and 77.4% in IAI. Susceptibility was highest in ESBL-Escherichia coli (90.6%) and lower in Klebsiella pneumoniae (72.9%) and Enterobacter cloacae (55.3%). Among ESBL-E, the MIC distribution for C/T was centered at ≤0.5-2 mg/L, corresponding to an overall susceptibility of 83.1%; resistant isolates (MIC ≥8 mg/L) were uncommon (12.4%) but clustered in selected species and sources. CONCLUSION: C/T susceptibility among ESBL-E was high in E. coli but substantially lower and more variable in K. pneumoniae and E. cloacae; the aggregate order-level susceptibility of 83.1% should not be relied upon to guide empiric therapy when Klebsiella or Enterobacter infection is suspected. Continued surveillance and susceptibility testing are essential to support evidence-based antimicrobial use.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Susceptibility in ESBL-Producing Enterobacterales: Insights from the SMART Program 2020-2022 in China. — 科研速览 Science Skim