科研速览继续刷下去 →
◆ Frontiers in medicine2026-01-01

Efficacy and safety of oliceridine versus sufentanil for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia following gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial.

Jingmei Zhou, Zhuangbo Wu, Yuqing Lai, Jingxin Shi, Wenbo Chen, Zhengqin Wu, Xukeng Guo, Meizhen Li, Xingcong Jiang, Shaohui Zhuang, Ronghua Huang, Weiqi Ke

一句话结论

For postoperative analgesia following gynecological laparoscopic surgery, oliceridine provides effective analgesia comparable to sufentanil while significantly reducing the risk of opioid-related PONV, demonstrating a favorable safety profile.

原始摘要(原文)
BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and incidence of adverse reactions of oliceridine versus sufentanil in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) for postoperative pain management following gynecological laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind trial, 152 patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery were randomly assigned to receive PCIA with either oliceridine (Group O, 0.4 mg/kg, n = 76) or sufentanil (Group S, 2 μg/kg, n = 76). The primary outcome was the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score at rest at 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, number of PCIA demands, rescue analgesic use, adverse events, time to first flatus and defecation, patient satisfaction, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Resting VAS scores were comparable between groups except at 4 h (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in MMSE scores, PCIA demands, rescue analgesia, time to first defecation, or other adverse events (pruritus, dizziness, fever, headache, cough, and abdominal distension) (all p > 0.05). Group O had higher body weight and body mass index (BMI) than Group S (p = 0.028 and p = 0.041, respectively). Group O demonstrated lower postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) incidence (19.48% vs. 36.14%; relative risk (RR), 0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.32-0.92; p = 0.019), prolonged time to first flatus (27.16 ± 9.33 h vs. 23.23 ± 9.36 h; p = 0.014), and higher patient satisfaction (4.09 ± 0.81 vs. 3.74 ± 0.72; p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: For postoperative analgesia following gynecological laparoscopic surgery, oliceridine provides effective analgesia comparable to sufentanil while significantly reducing the risk of opioid-related PONV, demonstrating a favorable safety profile. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.chictr.org.cn/, ChiCTR2400089648.
读原文 ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文

Efficacy and safety of oliceridine versus sufentanil for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia following gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial. — 科研速览 Science Skim