科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Clinical oral investigations2026-09-18

Effect of two biomimetic remineralizing systems on artificially demineralized enamel: Assessment of mineral recovery and orthodontic bracket bond strength.

Ascensión Vicente, Antonio J Ortiz-Ruiz, Clara Serna-Muñoz, Inmaculada Cabello, Yolanda Martínez-Beneyto

一句话结论 · In one sentence

Both agents partially remineralized enamel without fully restoring sound enamel properties. Regenerate™ demonstrated better mineral recovery than Orthocare™. However, the newly formed hydroxyapatite appeared immature, and bond strength was not significantly improved compared with demineralized enamel.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of two remineralizing systems (Regenerate™ and Orthocare™) on the mineral recovery of demineralized enamel and on the shear bond strength (SBS) of brackets. METHODS: 180 bovine teeth were divided into four groups: 1)Intact enamel, 2)Demineralized enamel, 3)Demineralized enamel/Regenerate™, and 4)Demineralized enamel treated/Orthocare™. Groups 2 to 4 were demineralized. All samples were brushed three times daily; groups 1 and 2 without toothpaste, and groups 3 and 4 were treated with Regenerate™ or Orthocare™. Outcomes were assessed by SBS, adhesive remnant area, field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), Raman spectroscopy, surface microhardness, and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Parametric or non-parametric tests according to data distribution (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Demineralized enamel showed significantly lower SBS, adhesive remnant, surface microhardness, mineral density, calcium and phosphorus content, and phosphate-related Raman parameters than intact enamel (p < 0.05). FE-SEM revealed increased porosity. Neither remineralizing system significantly restored SBS compared with untreated demineralized enamel. However, both treatments promoted partial enamel remineralization, improved calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) levels (p < 0.001), increasing surface microhardness and mineral density (p < 0.05). Raman showed greater recovery of phosphate (I960) and carbonate (I1070) peaks in the Regenerate™ group, indicating better mineralization and crystallinity recovery than Orthocare™. CONCLUSIONS: Both agents partially remineralized enamel without fully restoring sound enamel properties. Regenerate™ demonstrated better mineral recovery than Orthocare™. However, the newly formed hydroxyapatite appeared immature, and bond strength was not significantly improved compared with demineralized enamel. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Remineralizing agents may improve demineralized enamel before orthodontic bonding without significantly affecting bracket bond strength.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Effect of two biomimetic remineralizing systems on artificially demineralized enamel: Assessment of mineral recovery and orthodontic bracket bond strength. — 科研速览 Science Skim