科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Frontiers in Agronomy2026-03-24· Metagenomics

Natural farming as a sustainable agricultural approach enhances soil health and microbial diversity in wheat cultivation: a metagenomic perspective

Kartik Gajjar, Mahendra Chaudhary, Sweta Patel, Nandini Vasa, Rajiv Maniyar, Dhanvanti Agrawal, C. K. Patel, Doongar Chaudhary, Chaitanya Joshi, Madhvi Joshi, Darshan Dharajiya

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Natural Farming System (NFS) is an eco-friendly agricultural approach that avoids chemical inputs and promotes sustainability by utilizing locally available on-farm resources. Farmers are increasingly adopting NFS, but its scientific validation remains limited due to inadequate comparative studies with the Conventional Farming System (CFS). This study compared nine NFS treatments with a CFS control in wheat cultivation to assess impacts on soil microbial diversity, nutrient status, enzyme activities, and yield. Different NFS treatments showed significant improvements in soil health, including higher organic carbon, available nitrogen, and potassium (up to 2.47-, 1.30-, and 1.54-fold, respectively) along with enhanced microbial enzyme activities (1.35 to 2.49-fold) compared to CFS. 16S rRNA amplicon metagenomics revealed richer microbial diversity in NFS, with enrichment of beneficial bacterial genera such as Microvirga , Gp6, and Rhizobium , while ITS data indicated higher abundance of Humicola , Amesia , and Chaetomium in NFS, suggesting improved nutrient cycling and organic matter decomposition. Co-occurrence networks in NFS showed more positive correlation (bacteria: 75.3% and fungi: 72.8%) than CFS (bacteria: 59.0% and fungi: 53.6%). Moreover, NFS achieved comparable yields (grain: up to 3807 kg/ha; straw: up to 6650 kg/ha) and Benefit-Cost Ratio (up to 4.0, under condition when farmer owns a cow) compared to CFS (grain: 4088 kg/ha; straw: 4451 kg/ha; BCR: 3.5). NFS treatments with groundnut haulm mulch (>5.0 t/ha) and Ghanjeevamrit (>1.0 t/ha) performed better, highlighting their potential as sustainable alternative for wheat cultivation. In contrast, under non-livestock scenarios, NFS was economically less favorable than CFS. Further long-term evaluation of NFS treatments across soil types and agroclimatic zones will strengthen and deepen the understanding of its effects on wheat cultivation.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Natural farming as a sustainable agricultural approach enhances soil health and microbial diversity in wheat cultivation: a metagenomic perspective — 科研速览 Science Skim