W Rief, Julia Asbrand, Luisa Baumgärtner, Ulrike Dinger, Christoph Flückiger, Nina Heinrichs, Sabine C. Herpertz, Tania Lincoln, Silke Lipinski, Wolfgang Lutz, Bernhard Strauss, Svenja Taubner, Oliver Vorthmann, Jan Philipp Klein
Background The definition of psychological treatments and psychotherapy has various implications for communication within research and clinical care, as well as for legal issues — particularly in countries with psychotherapy acts. It can define what should be covered by public healthcare systems and who should be permitted to provide these services. Method We assembled a group of psychotherapists in Germany to develop an inclusive, scientific definition of psychotherapy. This definition should serve as an umbrella that is not limited to traditional treatment schools and is suitable for science, clinical care and legal acts. The group comprised people with different therapeutic backgrounds (e.g., CBT, psychodynamic and systemic therapy), experts from various disciplines (e.g., psychology, psychiatry and psychosomatic medicine), people focusing on different age groups (e.g., adults and youth), individuals with lived experience of psychotherapy and early career clinicians. Results A literature review led us to consider four aspects of a definition. What are the treatment means or 'tools'? (modality of treatment); how does the treatment work? (Proposed change mechanisms, assumptions about causal and evidence-based processes and concepts); who receives psychotherapy? (target group); and who provides psychotherapy? (Provider). Based on these aspects, we offer a definition of psychological therapy. Discussion Our suggested definition is not bound to specific treatment orientations, but is intended to encompass both traditional approaches and innovative developments. Our aim is to promote the evidence-based provision of psychological therapy within healthcare systems and legal frameworks.