Farhana Zabin, Mrittika Dey, Ismat Ara Tabassum, Puspika Paul, Most. Hasna Banu, Mst. Sumaya Tasnim, Reshma Haque, Sabiha Akhter, Motia Mannan, Jannatul Ma'wa
This study examines the methodological congruence between international standards and Natural Language Processing (NLP)-based assessment within Bangladesh's National Curriculum and Textbook Board (NCTB) English curriculum. Although AI-based grading systems are increasingly used in education, most remain built on Western language norms and tend to overlook local educational contexts and the influence of learners' first language (L1: Bangla). Using a qualitative research design, this study conducted content analysis of 200 student essays (100 at the SSC level and 100 at the HSC level) alongside semi-structured interviews with 15 local education professionals, including curriculum developers, teachers, and examiners. The findings reveal a high degree of contextual mismatch: existing NLP systems have no models calibrated to the NCTB level and tend to over-penalize non-standard but communicatively effective English. The absence of a locally digitized corpus further complicates the development of fair automated grading systems. By shifting the evaluative focus from native-speaker norms to locally competent communicators, this study underscores the importance of incorporating cultural and linguistic context into AI-based assessment tools. It proposes a tentative policy framework to guide policymakers toward culturally responsive NLP systems that support fairer student assessment in Bangladesh.