科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites2026-06-30· Tourism

TOURISM IN UTTARAKHAND, INDIA: COSTS AND POLICY RESPONSES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Shailja Khanduri

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
This study examines Uttarakhand’s tourism system from a spatial–systems lens to identify the key economic, environmental, and socio-cultural costs associated with rapid tourism expansion, and to assess whether current governance responses are adequate. It also develops a feedback-based conceptual model linking tourism drivers, growth patterns, costs, governance, and development outcomes. A mixed qualitative–quantitative design was used, combining a narrative literature synthesis with secondary analysis of official statistics and environmental/economic indicators. Governance and policy were assessed using tourism policy documents and institutional review, supported by comparative benchmarking from Sikkim, Bhutan, Kerala, and Indonesia, culminating in a Drivers–Tourism Growth–Costs–Governance–Outcomes framework. Findings show strong corridor-based and seasonal concentration of tourist flows (notably along Dehradun–Rishikesh–Haridwar–Nainital), alongside post-pandemic surges that intensify infrastructure pressure. Environmental stress is evidenced through forest-cover decline, seasonal spikes in waste and water demand, and carrying-capacity exceedance in key pilgrimage sites, while socioeconomic patterns indicate informal employment vulnerabilities, revenue leakages, and rising land/service prices that deepen regional inequities. Governance gaps persist due to institutional fragmentation and limited monitoring of ecological thresholds while the community stays uninterested. Tourism growth in Uttarakhand, as currently structured, risks undermining ecological resilience and inclusive development unless governance capacity improves. The proposed feedback model highlights governance quality as the key mediator shaping whether tourism contributes to balanced outcomes aligned with SDGs 8, 11, 12, and 15. The study indicates that adaptive governance, spatial diversification, community-based approaches, greener infrastructure, and integrated monitoring systems can better manage tourism-related trade-offs in fragile mountain regions.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

TOURISM IN UTTARAKHAND, INDIA: COSTS AND POLICY RESPONSES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT — 科研速览 Science Skim