Mufina Begam J.
Objectives: To compare the economic and psychological differences between female social media creators earning through digital platforms and traditionally employed salaried women in India. Material and Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted using 150 public Instagram profiles of female creators, coded for thematic content. Secondary labor market data for salaried Indian women were used for economic comparison. Quantitative analysis included frequency counts and a chi-square test assessing engagement and body-focused content. Results: Creators predominantly displayed financial independence narratives (84%), anti-9–5 messaging (68%), luxury lifestyle content (76%), body-focused posts (82%), monetization mentions (34%), and empowerment framing (71%). Higher engagement was significantly associated with body-focused content (χ 2 (1, N=150)=12.4, p <.001). Estimated creator earnings (₹40,000–70,000/month) were 3–5 times higher than average salaried women (₹13,666/month), though income was unstable and required continuous visibility work. Such contrasts may contribute to social comparison, body-image concerns, and psychological stress among salaried women. Conclusion: Digital creators may earn more than traditionally employed women but face income instability driven by visibility and appearance-based engagement. These dynamics foster unrealistic comparisons and potential psychological strain, underscoring the need for ethical digital labor guidelines and mental-health-informed employment policies.