Tynchenko Vadim S., Lyudmila V. Evgrafova, Pchelintseva Svetlana Viacheslavovna, Nikanorov Mikhail Sergeevich, Muzalev Konstantin Sergeevieh
This study investigates the effectiveness of membrane technologies for the integrated separation and purification of synthesis gas derived from coal gasification. Experiments were conducted using a three-stage hollow-fibre membrane system operating at temperatures between 45 and 55 °C and feed gas flow rates between 120 and 220 Nm³/h. The membrane process demonstrated high CO₂ removal efficiency, reducing the retentate CO₂ concentration from 6.1% to 0.9% and increasing the hydrogen content to 53.7%. The CO₂/H₂ separation factor ranged from 31 to 47, indicating strong selectivity. Energy consumption for single-pass processing was 58 kWh per 1000 Nm³ of synthesis gas, substantially lower than that of conventional absorption methods. The extended 48-hour operation confirmed the stability of membrane permeability and selectivity with minimal performance degradation. The final gas composition provided an optimal H₂/CO ratio suitable for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. These results highlight the technological and economic potential of membrane separation as an efficient alternative for large-scale coal gasification applications. Beyond reporting performance, this work presents a three-stage hollow-fibre scheme with retentate recompression that maintains stable selectivity over 48 h and achieves energy use of 58–84 kWh per 1000 Nm³. In contrast to Scholes et al. (2015), who reported single-pass CO₂ removal efficiencies and CO₂/H₂ selectivities of 25–30 under different membrane materials and feed compositions, our cascade increases hydrogen in the retentate to 53.7% with CO₂ as low as 0.9%, while keeping CO₂/H₂ selectivity within 31–47 across practical flow rates. Compared with the operating windows surveyed by Brunetti et al. (2010), the 45–55 °C, ~18 bar regime used here couples higher CO₂ permeability with stable H₂ retention and documents sulfur reduction to <20 ppm, directly relevant for Fischer–Tropsch feed conditioning.