科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Frontiers in pharmacology2026-01-01

Implementation of preemptive pharmacogenetic testing: progress, puzzles and priorities from an implementation science perspective.

Rong Hu, Kaizhi Weng, Biyun Guo, Shuquan Zhuang, Junli Zhou, Zhiming Hong, Ping Lin, Chunping Wu, Zhiyuan Chen, Yue Wang, Xiaofang Wang, Huiyan Huang, Hui Zhang, Hao Zheng, Yingyi He

一句话结论 · In one sentence

Experts internationally emphasized that PGx should be established as a core competency for all pharmacists. Pharmacists with both foundational and applied PGx competencies are well-positioned to contribute meaningfully to the clinical integration and advancement of PGx services. A longitudinal, integrated educational approach delivered by academics and health professionals with PGx expertise was viewed as essential for preparing students to apply PGx principles effectively in real-world practice. For South Africa, coordinated collaboration among higher education institutions, healthcare organizations, and professional regulatory bodies will be critical to embedding PGx within pharmacy education and advancing national precision-medicine goals.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Preemptive pharmacogenetics (PGx) testing, which leverages genetic variation to predict drug response and toxicity, represents a pivotal advancement in precision medicine. By predicting drug-gene interactions and guiding precision dosing, it demonstrates significant potential to enhance drug safety and efficacy. However, its integration into routine clinical practice still faces a substantial translational gap. This review examines preemptive PGx testing implementation through an implementation science lens, moving beyond clinical utility to synthesize the implementation landscape and identify systemic integration challenges. Over the past decade, a growing body of pragmatic implementation studies has systematically cataloged barriers and facilitators across multiple levels. Adoption metrics are now relatively well-documented, however, evidence on fidelity and long-term sustainability remains scarce, and most cost-effectiveness data derive from modeling rather than implementation trials. Successful implementation of preemptive PGx testing requires synergistic strategies across multiple domains, generating robust evidence through large-scale pragmatic trials, building health informatics infrastructure, and establishing multidisciplinary service. Critical to this transformation are standardized clinical workflows, comprehensive education for healthcare providers and patients, and active participation in collaborative networks to accelerate knowledge sharing. A persistent equity gap remains that nearly all published preemptive PGx implementation programs originate from high-income countries, underscoring the urgent need for context-adapted approaches in low- and middle-income settings. Emerging implementation frameworks might offer practical guidance for embedding equity into implementation design. This paradigm shift necessitates coordinated efforts from multi-stakeholders to bridge the translational gap, ultimately enabling equitable and sustainable PGx implementation across diverse healthcare settings.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Implementation of preemptive pharmacogenetic testing: progress, puzzles and priorities from an implementation science perspective. — 科研速览 Science Skim