科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ JMIR mHealth and uHealth2026-08-11

Functionality Review of Mobile Apps for the Tracking and Self-Management of Fatigue: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.

Amr Diouf Abdulla, Corina Sas, Gavin Doherty

一句话结论 · In one sentence

The top-ranked apps for fatigue in the major marketplaces support 3 main functionalities under the scope of tracking fatigue along with related data, and visualizing such data, with limited provision of self-management interventions. Drawing from these findings, we articulate implications for the sensitive design of technologies to support the management of fatigue, including supporting hybrid tracking, combined visualizations to support sense-making of fatigue data with related factors, and supporting energy estimates and pacing interventions.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) have a considerable impact on quality of life, thus motivating people to develop skills for better management of their fatigue. While the number of commercial apps in this domain has increased, there has been limited exploration of their functionalities. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to address this research gap through a functionality review of 17 top-rated iOS and Android apps for fatigue, with the aim to articulate design implications for technologies focused on supporting the management of fatigue. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search on the 2 most common app marketplaces, which resulted in the initial identification of 427 Apple apps and 1218 Google apps. From these, 17 apps were selected for review after applying a screening process to shortlist the top-rated apps. The functionalities of these apps were then coded through a week-long usage of each app for an expert evaluation leveraging authors' human-computer interaction (HCI) expertise. We looked for functionalities such as tracking and visualization seen in previous research on functionality reviews, in addition to interventional functionalities, which were informed by research on fatigue. RESULTS: Findings reveal the prevalence of functionalities for tracking fatigue (8/17, 47%), related symptoms (8/17, 47%), for visualizing tracked content (10/17, 59%), for assessing the user's condition (2/17, 12%), and for providing interventions for the management of fatigue (12/17, 71%). Functionalities providing interventions for self-management of fatigue are surprisingly limited, with the most relevant ones including pacing (2/17, 12%) alongside energy estimation (2/17, 12%). CONCLUSIONS: The top-ranked apps for fatigue in the major marketplaces support 3 main functionalities under the scope of tracking fatigue along with related data, and visualizing such data, with limited provision of self-management interventions. Drawing from these findings, we articulate implications for the sensitive design of technologies to support the management of fatigue, including supporting hybrid tracking, combined visualizations to support sense-making of fatigue data with related factors, and supporting energy estimates and pacing interventions.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Functionality Review of Mobile Apps for the Tracking and Self-Management of Fatigue: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis. — 科研速览 Science Skim