科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◇ UNC Libraries2026-08-01· Medicine

Effectiveness of intrapartum azithromycin to prevent infections in planned vaginal births in low-income and middle-income countries: a post-hoc analysis of data from a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Janet Moore, Fabian Esamai, Paul Nyongesa, Alan T N Tita, Robert L. Goldenberg, Richard J. Derman, Sherri Bucher, Manju Waikar, Adrien Lokangaka, Poonam Shivkumar, A-PLUS Trial Group, Elizabeth M. McClure, Denise C. Babineau, Nancy F. Krebs, Jennifer Hemingway‐Foday, Musaku Mwenechanya, Patricia L Hibberd, Ruth Lennox, Elwyn Chomba, Sarah Saleem, Manolo Mazariegos, William Petri, Archana Patel, Shiyam Sunder Tikmani, Sk Masum Billah, Waldemar A Carlo, Marion Koso-Thomas, Shivaprasad S. Goudar, Saleem Jessani, Melissa Bauserman, Antoinette Tshefu, Mrityunjay Metgud, Rashidul Haque, Avinash Kavi, Osayame Austine Ekhaguere, Jackie K. Patterson

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Background In 2023, the Azithromycin Prevention in Labor Use (A-PLUS) trial showed intrapartum azithromycin reduces maternal sepsis or death in women with planned vaginal delivery in low-resource settings, but whether it reduces maternal infection is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of intrapartum azithromycin in reducing maternal infection. Methods We performed a post-hoc analysis of the multicentre, facility-based, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled A-PLUS trial. This trial compared prophylactic intrapartum single oral dose of 2 g azithromycin versus placebo on maternal morbidity and mortality in low-resource settings in southeast Asia and Africa from Sept 9, 2020, to Aug 18, 2022. The trial enrolled women in labour at 28 weeks' gestation (or later) at eight sites in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kenya, Zambia, Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Guatemala and found that azithromycin reduced the incidence of maternal sepsis or death. The primary outcome of the present analysis was the incidence of any maternal infection in the azithromycin versus placebo groups, which was defined as one or more of these infections after randomisation: chorioamnionitis, endometritis, perineal or caesarean wound infection, abdominopelvic abscess, mastitis or breast abscess, and other infections. Any neonatal infection was also analysed. All analyses were by intention to treat in all those with data available for that outcome. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were estimated with a Poisson model adjusted for treatment group and site. Subgroup analyses included a two-way interaction test between intervention group and subgroup. A-PLUS was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03871491. Findings 29 278 women were randomly assigned to groups: 14 590 to receive azithromycin, 14 688 to receive placebo. Baseline characteristics were similar between the azithromycin and placebo groups (43&middot;3% vs 43&middot;4% primiparous, 8&middot;5% vs 8&middot;7% high risk for infection). The presence of any maternal infection occurred less often in the azithromycin group (580 [4&middot;0%] of 14 558) compared with the placebo group (824 [5&middot;6%] of 14 661 women; RR 0&middot;71, 95% CI 0&middot;64–0&middot;79, p<0&middot;0001). Any neonatal infection did not differ between treatment groups. Adverse events were not detected. Interpretation Among women planning vaginal delivery, this analysis provides evidence indicating that intrapartum azithromycin is associated with a lower incidence of maternal infections than placebo. Funding The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation via Foundation of National Institutes of Health. Translations For the French and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Effectiveness of intrapartum azithromycin to prevent infections in planned vaginal births in low-income and middle-income countries: a post-hoc analysis of data from a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial — 科研速览 Science Skim