科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◇ UNC Libraries2026-08-01· Medicine

Utility of Frailty Index in Predicting Discharge Disposition and Prolonged Length of Stay Following Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Isaac Sontag-Milobsky, Tariq Z. Issa, Christopher A. Reynolds, David W. Manning, Jennings H. Dooley, Kevin D. Hardt, W. Christian Thomas

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Background Predictive tools such as the risk assessment and prediction tool (RAPT) and the 5-item modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) have been created to assist in discharge planning after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) including hip and knee arthroplasty, but there is no uniform determination of frailty risks. The primary objective was to compare the modified Frailty Index and RAPT in assessing outcomes following TJA, and we hypothesized similar performance between both measures. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of patients aged 50 years and more undergoing primary elective TJA at a single academic tertiary center through the same Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol. Patients were stratified using mFI-5 and RAPT scores tabulated during preoperative clinic visits. Multivariable analyses were conducted to assess independent associations of mFI-5 and RAPT with complications, prolonged length of stay, readmissions, and nonhome discharge. Youden’s index was used to construct receiver operating characteristic curves to assess the predictive ability of mFI-5, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and RAPT in classifying outcomes. Results A total 858 TJA patients were included. Overall, 547 (63.8%) were not frail, 273 (31.8%) were prefrail, and 38 (4.4%) were frail. When stratifying by RAPT, 369 (43.0%) had RAPT > 9 (low-risk), 402 (46.9%) had RAPT 6-9 (moderate-risk), and 87 (10.1%) had RAPT < 6 (high-risk). Prefrailty (odds ratio [OR]: 2.31, P = .006) and frailty (OR: 8.82, P < .001) were associated with higher nonhome discharge. Both RAPT 6-9 (OR: 4.87, P = .001) and RAPT < 6 (OR: 27.2, P < .001) were associated with nonhome discharge. Neither was independently associated with complications or readmissions. These indices were poor independent predictors of complications, readmissions, and prolonged length of stay (all, area under the curve [AUC] < 0.7). While RAPT demonstrated the greatest discriminative ability in identifying nonhome discharge (AUC: 0.772), mFI-5 (AUC: 0.720) was also an acceptable predictors of nonhome discharge. Conclusions The mFI-5 performs similarly to RAPT in predicting 30-day TJA outcomes. Using the mFI-5 may aid preoperative risk stratification to optimally identify candidates for home discharge.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Utility of Frailty Index in Predicting Discharge Disposition and Prolonged Length of Stay Following Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty — 科研速览 Science Skim