Reproducibility Materials for “From Elicitation to Rating: Mood-Label Prominence and Song-Specific Agreement”

This project contains version 1.4.0 of the reproducibility materials for the manuscript “From Elicitation to Rating: Mood-Label Prominence and Song-Specific Agreement.” It includes Python analysis scripts, a codebook, data-integrity reports, derived analytic outputs, sensitivity analyses, coverage diagnostics, and publication figures. Version 1.4.0 adds targeted final-review checks using a marginal denominator restricted to different-song pairs, Stage 1-exposed and Stage 1-unseen song subsets, separate and joint prominence-component models, and data/score reconciliation diagnostics. The archived version 1.4.0 files retain the manuscript's earlier title, “From Elicitation to Rating: Mood-Label Prominence and Marginal-Adjusted Song-Specific Agreement.” The title was subsequently shortened for readability; the data, code, analyses, numerical results, and DOI are unchanged. The study is an exploratory secondary analysis of the publicly available GlobalMood dataset. It examines whether population-specific mood labels that were more prominent during an elicitation stage were associated with a larger proportional reduction in same-song disagreement relative to marginal disagreement during a later rating stage. The parent report describes separate recruitment for the two stages, although the public release does not permit person-level verification of nonoverlap. Original GlobalMood input files are not redistributed. The ratings, mean ratings, and song metadata are available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8C5F2. The annotation-chain file and five language-specific rating-dimension files are available from the creators' official GitHub repository at fixed commit https://github.com/harin-git/GlobalMood/tree/975ec1ece254adf293e25eb304591dd5688b13d3. Reproduction instructions, required filenames and checksums, tested software dependencies, and the analysis sequence are provided in the archived README. This deposit documents a completed secondary analysis and is not a preregistration. It does not provide an independent replication and should not be interpreted as evidence of absolute consensus, causal cultural effects, acoustic mediation, or cultural universality.