Laura N Anderson, Laura Duncan, Jennifer I Payne, Jacqueline H Stephens, Catherine Troisi, Robin Taylor Wilson
Finally, we call for expanded engagement of Canadian epidemiologists and biostatisticians in global networks like INEP, which are essential for bridging science and policy, strengthening public trust, and ensuring epidemiologic evidence informs public health action.
Gaps between epidemiological evidence and public policy remain a persistent challenge in public health. Despite increasing data availability, and public awareness, evidence often fails to translate into timely or equitable policy action. In this Commentary, we argue that epidemiologists must come together to support the integrity of evidence-informed public health policy making. As an example, we describe the International Network for Epidemiology in Policy (INEP). INEP was established in 2006 to address these gaps by promoting the more ethical and effective use of epidemiological evidence in policy making. Comprising 25 member organizations, including the Canadian Society for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, INEP provides an international forum to support the bridge between science and policy. Highlighted is the Toolkit on the Misuse of Epidemiological Methods which provides a framework for recognizing and countering misinformation used to cast doubt and confuse the public and policy makers. Also highlighted is the statement on Including Children's Voices in Policy as an example of INEP's advocacy for equitable, evidence-informed, decision-making. Finally, we call for expanded engagement of Canadian epidemiologists and biostatisticians in global networks like INEP, which are essential for bridging science and policy, strengthening public trust, and ensuring epidemiologic evidence informs public health action.