科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Pediatrics2026-09-01

Early Check: The First 5 Years.

Donald B Bailey, Lisa M Gehtland, Holly Peay, Melissa Raspa, Scott M Shone, Anne C Wheeler, Cynthia M Powell, Sara M Andrews, Beth Lincoln Boyea, Emily Cheves, Kristin Clinard, Heidi Cope, Manisha Dass, Ana Forsythe, Angela You Gwaltney, Katerina S Kucera, Rebecca Moultrie, Katherine C Okoniewski, Samantha Scott, Rebecca B Wright

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Evidence of net benefit and feasibility of implementation is necessary for a health condition to become part of routine newborn screening. But acquiring data to support informed decision-making is difficult without a nimble and coordinated research capacity grounded in public health practice, a problem exacerbated in the case of rare disorders. To address this concern, we built and implemented Early Check to test the feasibility of a research resource that could adapt to changing needs for data. During the first 5 years, we (1) built a partnership among an independent scientific research institute, 2 universities, and the North Carolina State Laboratory of Public Health; (2) developed and evaluated low-touch statewide recruitment approaches and an online consent that met all institutional review board requirements; (3) selected 3 prototypic health conditions to test the system; (4) enrolled and screened nearly 27 000 newborns; and (5) identified 105 screen-positive participants for whom we provided counseling, diagnostic testing, and referral to specialized long-term clinical care for infants with confirmed diagnoses. After this initial phase, we used the same infrastructure to offer whole-genome sequencing at birth for more than 200 disorders. Lessons learned from Early Check and other similar projects will hopefully inform future efforts to build national capacity for newborn screening research.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Early Check: The First 5 Years. — 科研速览 Science Skim