Ana Vlasceanu, Elias Karam, Béatrice Aussilhou, Jeanne Dembinski, Louis de Mestier, Mickaël Lesurtel, Alain Sauvanet, Safi Dokmak
NACRT does not seem to compromise the benefits of laparoscopic surgery as LLP has comparable surgical and oncological outcomes compared to OLP.
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) has become a standard in the treatment of borderline and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC). Left pancreatectomy (LP) is the procedure of choice for body and tail PDAC. Only a few data compare the outcomes of laparoscopic and open LP (LLP, OLP) after NACRT.
METHODS: A monocentric retrospective cohort of patients who underwent LLP or OLP for PDAC after NACRT between 2012 and 2024.
RESULTS: We included 57 patients, 22 LLP (39%) and 35 OLP (61%) with no difference regarding demographic characteristics. LLP compared to OLP showed less median blood loss (100 vs. 300 mL, p = 0.002), shorter median operative time (210 vs. 255 min, p = 0.003), and median length of stay (8 vs. 14 days, p < 0.001). Rates of Clavien III-IV complications (0 vs. 9%; p = 0.276), mortality (0% vs. 6%, p = 0.518) and grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (0 vs. 3%; p = 1.00) were similar. Median tumor size (25 vs. 21 mm, p = 0.657), median number of harvested lymph nodes (15 vs. 21, p = 0.185), and R0 resection rate (86% for both, p = 1.00) were similar as well. Three-year and five-year overall and disease-free survival were comparable.
CONCLUSION: NACRT does not seem to compromise the benefits of laparoscopic surgery as LLP has comparable surgical and oncological outcomes compared to OLP.