科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ CVIR endovascular2026-09-04

When "right" goes wrong: poor accuracy of calculated right adrenal vein aldosterone levels in subtyping primary aldosteronism.

Saachi Datta, Robin Wang, Vivek Bhalla, Jehan Z Bahrainwala, Susan Seav, Andrew C Picel, David Wang, Matthew L Hung

一句话结论 · In one sentence

The AldosteroneLAV:cAldosteroneRAV ratio can help to rule in right-sided disease with high specificity, but otherwise has poor overall accuracy in disease subtyping, underscoring the importance of meticulous technique to achieve diagnostic samples during adrenal vein sampling.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to externally validate a published ratio of left adrenal aldosterone to calculated-right adrenal aldosterone (AldosteroneLAV:cAldosteroneRAV) proposed to determine disease subtype when right-sided adrenal vein sampling is unsuccessful. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 199 post-adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation adrenal vein sampling cases (2016-2025). A selectivity index ≥ 5 was considered diagnostic and lateralization index ≥ 4 indicated unilateral disease. The cAldosteroneRAV was calculated as cAldosteroneRAV = [2 × AldosteroneIVC × (CortisolLAV/CortisolIVC)]-AldosteroneLAV. The ratio of AldosteroneLAV:cAldosteroneRAV determined disease subtype; published thresholds were ≥ 3 for left-sided and ≤ 0.33 for right-sided disease. Intermediate values were deemed bilateral disease. Sensitivities and specificities of this metric were calculated using standard AVS interpretation as the gold standard reference. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis performed on the AldosteroneLAV:cAldosteroneRAV ratio derived institution-optimized thresholds by maximizing the Youden's J statistic. RESULTS: Adrenal vein sampling was technically successful with determinate lateralization indices in 164 patients (41 left, 35 right, 88 bilateral). Using the published thresholds of 3 and 0.33, the AldosteroneLAV:cAldosteroneRAV ratio had an overall accuracy of 43.3% (95% CI 35.9-50.9%). Institution-optimized thresholds of ≥ 32.43 (left-sided) and ≤ 0.56 (right-sided) improved the accuracy to 65.9% (95% CI 58.3-72.7%). Using institution-optimized thresholds, the sensitivities/specificities for the calculated right-sided, left-sided, and bilateral disease were 88.6%/95.3%, 92.7%/63.4%, and 44.3%/93.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The AldosteroneLAV:cAldosteroneRAV ratio can help to rule in right-sided disease with high specificity, but otherwise has poor overall accuracy in disease subtyping, underscoring the importance of meticulous technique to achieve diagnostic samples during adrenal vein sampling.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

When "right" goes wrong: poor accuracy of calculated right adrenal vein aldosterone levels in subtyping primary aldosteronism. — 科研速览 Science Skim