科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Women's studies international forum2026-05-01

Are pads the priority? Contested framings of the Brazilian National Policy on menstrual health and dignity.

Isabela Hümmelgen, Inga T Winkler

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Policymakers and policy advocates in Brazil have adopted various framings for menstrual policymaking, including menstrual precarity, health and dignity. Relying on the concept of framing and applying the "what is the problem represented to be?" approach, we unpack how menstrual needs are represented and how these representations inform and curtail proposed solutions in the Brazilian national policy. We rely on document analysis and interviews with activists and policymakers to present the debates from 2019 to 2024. We find that the Brazilian policy adopted novel and holistic language on health and dignity which is much broader than in other national contexts. Ultimately, however, policy priorities in Brazil mirrored those in other contexts and remain largely limited to distribution of menstrual products. Meanwhile, activists have been actively demanding the implementation of a broader agenda, that includes confronting menstrual stigma, investing in menstrual education, and providing health care services to menstruators, which opens up promising avenues for future policy directions.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Are pads the priority? Contested framings of the Brazilian National Policy on menstrual health and dignity. — 科研速览 Science Skim