科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Neurosurgery practice2026-08-01

Preliminary Clinical Experience With a Novel Foamy Collagen-Based Dural Substitute (Foamagen) for Dural Closure Following Translabyrinthine Craniotomy: An Exploratory Comparison With DuraSeal.

Hsuan-Yi Wu, Po-Huang Chen, Chen-Shu Wu, Chun-Fu Lin, Sanford P C Hsu

一句话结论 · In one sentence

In this small exploratory cohort, Foamagen demonstrated outcomes comparable with those of the standard sealant DuraSeal. Foamagen may therefore serve as a safe and effective alternative for preventing CSF leakage following CP angle tumor resection. However, the study was substantially underpowered to establish noninferiority, and larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm this observation.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage remains a common and clinically significant complication following skull base surgery, particularly with the translabyrinthine approach for cerebellopontine (CP) angle tumor resection. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Foamagen in CP angle tumor resection performed through the translabyrinthine approach. METHODS: Patients undergoing CP angle tumor resection using the translabyrinthine approach were categorized into 2 groups based on the dural closure material: the intervention group received Foamagen, whereas the control group received the standard sealant DuraSeal (Integra LifeSciences). Outcomes included CSF leakage (wound leak or rhinorrhea), surgical site infection, need for lumbar drainage, and reoperation at discharge and at 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Among 40 patients, 18 were assigned to the Foamagen group and 22 to the DuraSeal group. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. At discharge, the incidence of CSF leakage was low and similar in both groups [5.6% (95% CI: 0.1%-27.3%) vs 4.5% (95% CI: 0.1%-22.8%); risk difference +1.0% (95% CI: -12.7% to +14.7%), P = 1.000]. No significant differences were observed in postoperative infection (5.6% vs 4.5%, P = 1.000), lumbar drain placement (11.1% vs 4.5%, P = .579), or reoperation rates (0% vs 4.5%, P = .369). At the 3-month follow-up, no CSF leakage or abnormal dural thickening was identified in either group. CONCLUSION: In this small exploratory cohort, Foamagen demonstrated outcomes comparable with those of the standard sealant DuraSeal. Foamagen may therefore serve as a safe and effective alternative for preventing CSF leakage following CP angle tumor resection. However, the study was substantially underpowered to establish noninferiority, and larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm this observation.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Preliminary Clinical Experience With a Novel Foamy Collagen-Based Dural Substitute (Foamagen) for Dural Closure Following Translabyrinthine Craniotomy: An Exploratory Comparison With DuraSeal. — 科研速览 Science Skim