科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Radiological physics and technology2026-09-22

Evaluation of the image quality index with MRI motion artifacts on tumor segmentation using deep learning.

Masafumi Akanuma, Keisuke Usui, Ryoma Tsuchiya, Eiichi Maehara, Keisuke Fujita, Tatsuya Choji, Daiki Sakakibara, Hajime Sakamoto, Shinsuke Kyogoku, Hiroyuki Daida

一句话结论 · In one sentence

Footwear preferences were influenced by age and activity level. Younger participants preferred AFOs for functional benefits, while older participants prioritized comfort and selected RB shoes. These findings emphasize the need for personalized conservative treatment strategies in managing AOA.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Motion artifacts substantially degrade magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quality and can reduce diagnostic accuracy. Although deep learning-based segmentation has achieved high performance, the degree of motion-related degradation that begins to impair tumor contour delineation and the corresponding image quality criteria remains unclear. This study investigated the relationship between image quality and the agreement of segmentation outputs obtained from original and motion-degraded MRI images in deep learning-based brain tumor segmentation and explored tentative reference values for image quality metrics. Tumor contours were manually delineated on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images from patients with glioma, and a segmentation model was tested. Motion artifact images were then generated through simulation, and the relationship between the generated tumor contours and image quality was analyzed. The tumor contours were evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), while image quality was assessed using mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), structural similarity index measure (SSIM), and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). No strong correlations were observed between DSC and the evaluated image quality metrics. However, SSIM showed a positive association with visual assessment, suggesting that it better reflects tumor boundary visibility and perceived image degradation than other indices. In particular, an SSIM of 0.8 corresponded to a visual assessment score of 2 or higher, indicating a quality level at which observers can visually distinguish tumor boundaries. Because these findings may depend on the number of cases and the segmentation model used, further validation with clinical images is required to establish practical image quality criteria.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Evaluation of the image quality index with MRI motion artifacts on tumor segmentation using deep learning. — 科研速览 Science Skim