Len Bos, Alle Meije Wink, James H. Cole, Eva Strijbis, Bastiaan Moraal, Joep Killestein, Hugo Vrenken, Bernard M.J. Uitdehaag, Frederik Barkhof, Menno M. Schoonheim, Bas Jasperse
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD) is a novel marker of neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS). Brain-PAD has been associated with clinical disability in heterogeneous MS patient cohorts of varying ages and disease durations. In this study, we investigate the relation between clinical disability and brain-PAD in a unique birth-year cohort of people with MS (pwMS) and healthy controls (HCs) of the same age all born in 1966, eliminating age as a confounding factor. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional cohort study conducted in the Netherlands. Disability was quantified using the expanded disability status scale (EDSS), 9-hole peg test (9HPT), and the timed 25-foot walk test (T25FWT). Cognition was assessed using the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in MS battery. The brain-PAD was calculated by subtracting the person's chronological age from the predicted brain age derived from 3-dimensional T1-weighted brain MRI scans using machine learning (brainageR software). Brain-PAD for HCs and MS subtypes (relapsing remitting, secondary progressive, and primary progressive) were compared using a generalized linear model. The relation between brain-PAD and disease duration and disability and cognitive measures were tested using univariate linear regression. In addition, the clinical explanatory value added by brain-PAD to those of brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) and T2 lesion volume was investigated. RESULTS: < 0.0001). Brain-PAD had added explanatory value over BPF in clinical outcome measures. DISCUSSION: In a cohort unbiased by age differences, greater brain ageing was associated with worse performance on disability and cognitive tests, underscoring the potential of brain-PAD as a marker for neurodegeneration and disease severity in MS.