科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Genome Medicine2025-12-12· Computer science

Automating ACMG variant classifications with BIAS-2015 v2.1.1: algorithm analysis and benchmark against the FDA-approved eRepo dataset

Chris Eisenhart, Rachel Brickey, Brian Nadon, Joel Mewton, Vafa Bayat

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
BACKGROUND: In 2015, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), in collaboration with the Association of Molecular Pathologists (AMP), published guidelines for interpreting and classifying germline genomic variants. These guidelines defined five categories: benign, likely benign, uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, and pathogenic, with 28 criteria but no specific implementation algorithms. METHODS: Here we present Bitscopic Interpreting ACMG Standards 2015 (BIAS-2015 v2.1.1), an open-source software that automates the classification of variants based on 19 ACMG criteria while enabling user-defined weighting and manual adjustments for clinical contexts. BIAS-2015 supports high-throughput classification via command line, along with a web-based graphical user interface (GUI), enabling variant review, modification, and interactive curation. RESULTS: Using genomic data from the FDA-recognized ClinGen Evidence Repository (eRepo v2.2.0), we evaluated BIAS-2015’s sensitivity, specificity, and F1 values with expert curation. BIAS-2015 demonstrated superior performance to InterVar, achieving a pathogenic sensitivity of 73.99% (vs. 64.31%), benign sensitivity of 80.23% (vs. 53.91%), and a 11x speed improvement, classifying 1,327 variants per second. CONCLUSIONS: BIAS-2015 provides an accurate, scalable, and transparent ACMG classification framework. By standardizing ACMG interpretation and providing transparent rule-based logic, BIAS-2015 enables reproducible and comparable variant classification across research and clinical laboratories. All code and the interactive variant curation platform are available on GitHub. https://github.com/bitscopic/BIAS-2015
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Automating ACMG variant classifications with BIAS-2015 v2.1.1: algorithm analysis and benchmark against the FDA-approved eRepo dataset — 科研速览 Science Skim