科研速览继续刷下去 →
◆ BMC medical education2026-08-20

Immersive virtual reality vs. traditional instruction for short-term learning and follow-up outcomes in the Bobath concept: a randomized controlled trial.

Sena Cinarli, Gamze Aydogan, Ebru Sever, Gönül Ertunc Gulcelik, Halil Atmaca

一句话结论

These findings suggest that immersive virtual reality may support the preservation of practical performance over time in physiotherapy education and may represent a promising instructional approach for teaching complex neurorehabilitation skills.

原始摘要(原文)
BACKGROUND: Although virtual reality has increasingly been incorporated into health professions education, its effectiveness for teaching structured neurorehabilitation frameworks within physiotherapy remains insufficiently explored. PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare immersive virtual reality-based instruction with traditional education by evaluating theoretical knowledge and practical skills at short-term (2 days) and follow-up (2 weeks) assessments following Bobath concept instruction among physiotherapy students. METHODS: In this assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial, 20 third-year physiotherapy students (mean age: 21.3 ± 1.1 years) were randomly assigned to immersive virtual reality-based instruction or traditional instruction. Both groups received standardized 45-minute training on postural control strategies within the Bobath concept. Learning outcomes were assessed using a multiple-choice theoretical test and a practical examination at 2 days (short-term) and 2 weeks (follow-up) after instruction. RESULTS: Both groups showed a decrease in theoretical scores from the short-term to the follow-up assessment, with no significant between-group difference in change scores (p = 0.817). In contrast, between-group comparison of practical change scores showed a significant difference favoring the virtual reality group (p = 0.017, r = 0.54), with a median difference of + 15 points (95% CI: +5 to + 30). Within-group analyses indicated a significant decline in the traditional instruction group (p = 0.011, r = 0.81), whereas no significant change was observed in the virtual reality group (p = 0.666, r = 0.14). Practical scores increased by approximately 3% in the virtual reality group but decreased by 17% in the traditional instruction group from short-term to follow-up assessment. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that immersive virtual reality may support the preservation of practical performance over time in physiotherapy education and may represent a promising instructional approach for teaching complex neurorehabilitation skills. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT07270107 (retrospectively registered on December 8, 2025).
读原文 ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文

Immersive virtual reality vs. traditional instruction for short-term learning and follow-up outcomes in the Bobath concept: a randomized controlled trial. — 科研速览 Science Skim