科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Abdominal radiology (New York)2026-09-16

Preoperative identification of adverse pathology in clinically localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma: development and external validation of a contrast-enhanced ultrasound-based model.

Ji Ma, Zu-Sheng Du, Fang Li, Zhen-Fang Wang, Wenzhi Li, Rong Wu

一句话结论 · In one sentence

The model showed moderate external discrimination and may support preoperative assessment by identifying patients at lower risk. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to validate individual risk estimates and assess clinical impact.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
PURPOSE: To develop and externally validate a model combining contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), clinical, and laboratory features to identify adverse pathology in clinically localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). METHODS: This retrospective study included 370 surgically treated patients with cT1-T2 ccRCC. Center 1 patients were randomly split into training (n = 210) and internal test (n = 91) sets; Center 2 provided external validation (n = 69). Adverse pathology comprised WHO/ISUP grade 3-4, tumor necrosis, invasion, or nodal metastasis. Two blinded readers assessed images. All 41 preoperative candidates entered logistic least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression with stratified ten-fold cross-validation and the one-standard-error rule. Internal validation used 200 bootstrap resamples of the complete modeling procedure. RESULTS: Adverse pathology was present in 138 patients. Seven predictors were retained, including four CEUS features. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) were 0.810 (95% CI, 0.752-0.868), 0.875 (0.805-0.944), and 0.799 (0.688-0.910) in the training, internal test, and external cohorts, respectively; optimism-corrected training AUC was 0.747. External predictions were compressed (calibration slope, 2.380). At the training-derived threshold of 0.3051, adverse pathology was present in 61.5% (24/39) of external patients with positive results and 6.7% (2/30) with negative results, compared with 37.7% overall. CONCLUSION: The model showed moderate external discrimination and may support preoperative assessment by identifying patients at lower risk. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to validate individual risk estimates and assess clinical impact.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Preoperative identification of adverse pathology in clinically localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma: development and external validation of a contrast-enhanced ultrasound-based model. — 科研速览 Science Skim