科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Blood2026-02-09· Brentuximab vedotin

A randomized phase 2 study of ipilimumab, nivolumab, and brentuximab vedotin in patients with relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma

Catherine Diefenbach, Opeyemi A. Jegede, Victoria Wang, Stephen M. Ansell, Lale Kostakoglu, Christian Steidl, Yasodha Natkunam, David W. Scott, Richard F Ambinder, Kevin A. David, Ranjana H Advani, Nancy L. Bartlett, Michael J. Robertson, Sachdev P. Thomas, Jonathon Cohen, Sami Ibrahimi, Gaurav Goyal, Neha Mehta-Shah, Jennifer E. Amengual, Christopher Jon Forlenza, Peter D. Cole, Fenghai Duan, Kara M Kelly, Brad S. Kahl

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
ABSTRACT: The phase 1/2 Intergroup study E4412 investigated checkpoint blockade with nivolumab (Nivo) and ipilimumab (Ipi) combined with the CD30 targeting antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin (BV) in relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma. A total of 147 patients aged ≥12 years were randomized between BV/Nivo and BV/Ipi/Nivo; 132 patients were included in the primary efficacy analysis. The complete response (CR) rate, was 64.7% (52.2, 75.9) for BV/Nivo and 70.3% (57.6, 81.1) for BV/Ipi/Nivo (1-sided P = .29). The median survival follow-up was 38.0 months (interquartile range, 32.6-48.1). Progression-free survival (PFS) did not significantly differ between the 2 arms (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78, confidence interval [CI], 0.39-1.57; 1-sided P = .24). Treatment-related grade 3+ toxicities in the adult cohort, excluding rash, were similar between both arms (38.5% BV/Nivo and 39.3% BV/Ipi/Nivo); there was a higher frequency of grade 3 rash with BV/Ipi/Nivo (24.6%) compared with BV/Nivo (9.2%). We compared PFS by stem cell transplantation (SCT) status in a planned before hoc comparison; 58 patients received SCT, and 36-month PFS (from SCT) was >90% for both arms. Sixty-six patients were progression free after the first scan and did not undergo SCT. The 36-month PFS was 73.0% (54.5, 85.0) for BV/Ipi/Nivo compared with 45.8% (26.3, 63.4) for BV/Nivo (HR, 0.45; CI, 0.19-1.08; 1-sided P = .03). The study did not meet its primary end point of superior CR rate for the triplet, but it supports the use of checkpoint antibody-drug conjugate induction prior to auto SCT, and there is an intriguing signal of disease control for patients wishing to defer or avoid SCT with the triplet of BV/Ipi/Nivo. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01896999.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

A randomized phase 2 study of ipilimumab, nivolumab, and brentuximab vedotin in patients with relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma — 科研速览 Science Skim