Abdulla Fakhro, Bisher Tulimat
Structured, empathetic, culturally responsive communication improves shared decision-making, trust, equity, and surgical outcomes in plastic surgery. Evidence-based training and tools are essential for patient-centered care in diverse, technology-driven practices.
BACKGROUND: Patient-provider communication is fundamental to successful plastic surgery outcomes, yet communication barriers persist across diverse patient populations. This narrative review examines effective communication strategies and shared decision-making practices on patient engagement in plastic surgery. Additionally, it assesses how culturally responsive approaches can improve care quality and optimize surgical outcomes within the specialty.
METHODS: A narrative review of English-language literature (January 2004-November 2025) was performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, and reference citation tracking. Utilizing search terms related to plastic surgery, patient communication, and shared decision-making, 150 articles were screened, with 37 ultimately selected for qualitative synthesis.
RESULTS: Six domains emerged: communication effectiveness, shared decision-making, digital tools, trust-building, cultural responsiveness, and patient outcomes. Empathy and clarity correlated with higher satisfaction (e.g., meta-analysis: reduced decisional conflict). Digital tools improved access but raised privacy risks; cultural sensitivity reduced disparities (e.g., lower reconstruction rates in minorities). Training boosted adherence and safety. Implications for practice include structured shared decision-making tools, culturally tailored education, and ethics-guided digital communication protocols to reduce disparities and optimize outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Structured, empathetic, culturally responsive communication improves shared decision-making, trust, equity, and surgical outcomes in plastic surgery. Evidence-based training and tools are essential for patient-centered care in diverse, technology-driven practices.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .