Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity in Pregnant People With Type 1 Diabetes

Introduction: Prior studies have not identified if continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics at a critical gestational age window can discriminate risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. We evaluated late second- and third-trimester CGM metrics by gestational age associated with pregnancy outcomes in gravidas with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). Methods: Dexcom G6 CGM data from a retrospective cohort of singleton gestations with T1DM (2018-2022) at an academic medical center were analyzed. Time in, above, and below range 63 to 140 mg/dL (TIR, TAR, TBR), glycemic variability, and mean glucose concentration were computed in two-week CGM intervals from 24 0 to 39 6 weeks days . Adverse pregnancy outcomes were hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), large-for-gestational age (LGA), and neonatal hypoglycemia. Linear mixed-effects models were fitted on CGM metrics computed from two-week CGM intervals, with gestational age, adverse pregnancy outcomes (i.e. presence/absence of HDP, LGA, and/or neonatal hypoglycemia), and their interaction as fixed effects. Results: In 87 gravidas with preconception median hemoglobin A1c 6.5% (IQR 6.0, 7.1) and maternal body mass index 24.8 kg/m 2 (IQR 21.9, 27.1), 71% had at least one adverse pregnancy outcome. Between weeks 24 0 and 37 6 , gravidas with HDP had higher TAR and mean glucose and lower TIR ( P < .05). Gravidas with LGA had lower TBR between weeks 24 0 and 35 6 . TIR, TAR, and mean glucose evolution differed by HDP status, with greatest divergence between groups at 28 0 to 29 6 weeks’ gestation ( P ≤ .001). Conclusion: CGM metrics in the late second to early third trimester, a period of peak insulin resistance, may help to distinguish risk of HDP and LGA in gravidas with T1DM.