科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2026-08-31

A novel approach for evaluating and comparing multiple antipsychotic polypharmacy in adults across specialist intellectual disability services in England and Wales: A retrospective feasibility cohort study.

Samuel J Tromans, Helen Neilens, Crispin Musicha, Victoria Allgar, Emily Stanyard, Richard Laugharne, Paula McGowan, Angela Hassiotis, Sarah Lennard, Lance V Watkins, Bhathika Perera, Kiran Purandare, Ashok Roy, Indermeet Sawhney, Sujeet Jaydeokar, Ryan Ashford, Chris Rollinson, Hanna Abraham, Nusra Khodabux, Ogheneochuko Akusu, Samuel Paisley, Georgios Mousailidis, Meera Naran, Rohit Shankar

一句话结论 · In one sentence

Our study suggests that converting antipsychotic doses to chlorpromazine units is a simple and effective way to understand and compare prescribing burden for PwID. It also facilitates measuring prescribing and implementing best practice.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
BACKGROUND: In England and Wales, significant numbers of people with intellectual disability (PwID) are prescribed antipsychotics for a range of licensed and non-licensed indications, particularly behaviours that challenge. There is no system to compare antipsychotic prescribing practices across specialist adult intellectual disability (ID) services. AIM: This study aimed to determine whether converting antipsychotics and their doses to equivalent chlorpromazine units enables comparison of licensed (psychosis, etc.) and non-licensed (behaviours that challenge) prescribing between different services. METHOD: A feasibility retrospective cohort study using convenience sampling captured anonymized data of PwID on ⩾2 antipsychotics across eight specialist England and Wales adult ID services. The doses prescribed across 2017-2023 were converted to chlorpromazine-equivalent values, and antipsychotic dose burden across services was compared. Patients' characteristics and antipsychotic dosing are summarized descriptively. A mixed-effects regression model determines changes in chlorpromazine unit values across time. Subgroup analysis explores trends. Stata: Release 17 (StataCorp, 2021) and R (R Core Team, 2025) were used. RESULTS: Of the 424 reviewed records, a higher proportion were male (ranging from 58% to 71% across census years) and white individuals (73%-85%). Autism (42%-58%), psychotic illness (61%-71%), and behaviours that challenge (77%-87%) were the most common comorbidities. Chlorpromazine units could be captured for 98% (n = 416). PwID with psychosis, behaviours that challenge, depression, or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder were prescribed significantly higher chlorpromazine-equivalent doses. Over 25% were prescribed more than 1000 mg/day chlorpromazine equivalent, which exceeds the British National Formulary-recommended maximum dose. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that converting antipsychotic doses to chlorpromazine units is a simple and effective way to understand and compare prescribing burden for PwID. It also facilitates measuring prescribing and implementing best practice.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

A novel approach for evaluating and comparing multiple antipsychotic polypharmacy in adults across specialist intellectual disability services in England and Wales: A retrospective feasibility cohort study. — 科研速览 Science Skim