Mohamad Adam Bujang
Research Pearlsensure that mental health research produces results that are not only statistically defensible but also clinically and socially meaningful.Moving forward, this article expands on Cohen's seminal work by deepening the discussion of its underlying concepts and guiding researchers to appreciate the significance and continuing relevance of his contributions.The discussion is organized into two parts.The first, "Recognizing the Problem Cohen Addressed," revisits the challenges in statistical power that motivated his work.The second, "Critical Evaluations," offers reflections on its impact, limitations, and implications for modern research practice.The significance of this study lies in its effort to bridge the gap between Cohen's foundational ideas and contemporary research applications, thereby helping current and future researchers design, interpret, and report studies with appropriate statistical power. Discussion Recognizing the Problem Cohen AddressedBefore Cohen's intervention, the scientific community, particularly in psychology and the social sciences, was preoccupied mainly with p values and hypothesis