Dora L Clayton-Jones, Sylvia Pena, Kristin Haglund, Joan P Totka, Abir K Bekhet, Lee Za Ong, Janet Lucas, Edward Jenkins, Anne M Costello, James Griffin, Grainne Kilroy Ferlmann, Betty S Pace
Evaluation of the 6 intervention implementation parameters supports the use of simulation-based self-management intervention for young adults living with sickle cell disease. Integrating community voices and experiential learning strategies enhances self-efficacy, promotes meaningful behavior change, and improves real-world health management readiness during the critical period of emerging adulthood.
BACKGROUND: Young adults living with sickle cell disease (SCD) face complex self-management challenges during care-seeking. Developmentally appropriate, experiential interventions remain limited. Interventions to prepare young adults for emotionally charged real-world situations such as emergency department encounters, peer communication, and independent decision-making are needed.
PURPOSE: To describe the co-design of a simulation-based self-management intervention for young adults living with SCD and conduct evaluation of 6 intervention implementation parameters: necessity, acceptability, feasibility, safety, fidelity, and preliminary effectiveness.
METHODS: Using mixed-methods design guided by community-based participatory research and human-centered design, young adults living with sickle cell disease, caregivers, and community stakeholders co-created a simulation-based intervention with 3 video-supported scenarios with structured role-play and facilitated debriefing. Thirty participants aged 18 to 20 years completed pre-post surveys and participated in post-intervention focus groups. Quantitative data were analyzed using paired-sample t-tests, and qualitative data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Implementation evaluation demonstrated strong outcomes across all parameters. Participants indicated that the intervention is necessary, acceptable, feasible, safe, effective, and has high fidelity. Statistically significant improvements in self-efficacy were observed post-intervention. Qualitative findings supported these outcomes, with participants reporting increased confidence in emergency department advocacy, communication with healthcare providers and peers, and proactive self-management behaviors.
CONCLUSION: Evaluation of the 6 intervention implementation parameters supports the use of simulation-based self-management intervention for young adults living with sickle cell disease. Integrating community voices and experiential learning strategies enhances self-efficacy, promotes meaningful behavior change, and improves real-world health management readiness during the critical period of emerging adulthood.