科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Quantitative Science Studies2026-05-28· Citation

Have we reached the beginning of the end for review papers?

Barry Smyth, Pádraig Cunningham

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Abstract Review papers have traditionally enjoyed a high status in academic publishing. This is due to the role that reviews and surveys can play in summarizing and synthesizing a field of research. From an author’s perspective, reviews have the added advantage that they pick up significantly more citations than primary research papers presenting original research. There has been a dramatic increase in the publication of review papers in recent years, both in raw numbers and as a proportion of overall publication output. In this paper we demonstrate this increase across a wide range of fields of study. We demonstrate that there is indeed a citation dividend associated with review papers although this dividend is declining. We also show that, since the arrival of Generative AI (GenAI) tools in 2022 there is evidence of wide use of GenAI in review paper writing. The use of GenAI tools seems to be more prevalent in review papers than in primary research papers. We suggest that the potential for GenAI to do a lot of the work in preparing review papers will have a significant impact on their status.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Have we reached the beginning of the end for review papers? — 科研速览 Science Skim