Ozge Karakaya Suzan, Uğur Gül, Oğuz Koyuncu, Canberk Akdeniz
Attitudes toward AI, creative self-efficacy, perceived climate for innovation, and perceived clinical competence were significantly associated, and the statistical mediation and moderation patterns remained after adjustment. The cross-sectional, self-report data do not establish temporal or causal mechanisms or effects on objectively measured clinical performance or patient outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into health care; however, how nurses' attitudes toward AI and creative self-efficacy are associated with perceived clinical competence within different organizational contexts remains unclear.
AIM: To examine whether perceived climate for innovation statistically mediates the association between nurses' attitudes toward AI and perceived clinical competence and moderates the association between creative self-efficacy and perceived clinical competence.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 233 nurses recruited online by convenience sampling from hospitals in Türkiye between January and March 2026. Self-report measures assessed attitudes toward AI, creative self-efficacy, perceived climate for innovation, and perceived clinical competence. Pearson correlations and PROCESS Models 4 and 1 with 5000 bootstrap samples tested statistical mediation and moderation. Adjusted analyses included age, gender, previous AI-related training and AI use, educational level, professional experience, and institution type.
RESULTS: Attitudes toward AI were indirectly associated with perceived clinical competence through perceived climate for innovation; the adjusted indirect association remained significant (B = 0.0700, SE = 0.0333, 95% CI [0.0173, 0.1453]), consistent with partial statistical mediation. Perceived climate for innovation also moderated the association between creative self-efficacy and perceived clinical competence after adjustment (interaction B = -0.1672, SE = 0.0447, 95% CI [-0.2552, -0.0792]). This positive association became weaker as perceived climate for innovation increased.
CONCLUSION: Attitudes toward AI, creative self-efficacy, perceived climate for innovation, and perceived clinical competence were significantly associated, and the statistical mediation and moderation patterns remained after adjustment. The cross-sectional, self-report data do not establish temporal or causal mechanisms or effects on objectively measured clinical performance or patient outcomes.
IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nurse managers may consider supporting AI literacy, safe AI use, team-based learning, and innovation-supportive work environments. These strategies should be evaluated prospectively using objective clinical and patient outcomes before their effectiveness is inferred.