Minxing Zhang, Yi Yang, Roy Xie, Bhuwan Dhingra, S ZHOU, Jian Pei
Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents have recently emerged as a new paradigm that extends the capabilities of LLMs beyond text generation to dynamic interaction with external environments. A critical challenge lies in ensuring their g eneralizability – the ability to maintain consistently high performance across varied instructions, tasks, environments, and domains, especially those different from the agent’s fine-tuning data. Despite growing interest, the concept of generalizability in LLM-based agents remains underdefined, and systematic approaches to measure and improve it are lacking. We provide the first comprehensive review of generalizability in LLM-based agents. We begin by clarifying the definition and boundaries of agent generalizability. We then review existing benchmarks. Next, we categorize strategies for improving generalizability into three groups: methods targeting the backbone LLM, targeting agent components, and targeting their interactions. Furthermore, we introduce the distinction between g eneralizable frameworks and g eneralizable agents and outline how generalizable frameworks can be translated into agent-level generalizability. Finally, we identify future directions, including the development of standardized evaluation frameworks, variance- and cost-based metrics, and hybrid approaches that integrate methodological innovations with agent architecture-level designs. We aim to establish a foundation for principled research on building LLM-based agents that generalize reliably across diverse real-world applications.