科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Journal of Medical Ethics2025-12-23· Personhood

Non-consequentialist and egalitarian objections to the dead donor rule

Lawrence Masek

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Unlike some critics of the dead donor rule, I do not defend consequentialism or deny the personhood of any potential organ donor. Instead, I argue that the principles of ethics and action theory that support the dead donor rule also prohibit widely accepted procedures, including kidney and partial liver transplants from living donors, fetal surgeries that permanently damage the uterus, sequential or domino liver transplants and lethal palliation. If physicians sometimes may cause death as a result of relieving a patient's pain, then they sometimes may cause death as a result of fulfilling the patient's desire to donate a vital organ.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Non-consequentialist and egalitarian objections to the dead donor rule — 科研速览 Science Skim