科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)2026-08-01

Call for Ethical Guidelines in Cosmetic Dermatology for Adolescents.

Isabella J Tan, Julia L DiOrio, Bernard A Cohen

一句话结论 · In one sentence

A standardized, multi-component ethical framework is necessary to guide clinicians caring for adolescents seeking elective aesthetic procedures. Recommendations include medical-necessity assessment, structured counseling, strengthened parental consent, validated BDD screening, and careful documentation with follow-up. Clear, evidence-informed ethical standards are essential to safeguard adolescent well-being and prioritize patient welfare over commercial interest.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of appearance-enhancing dermatology procedures among adolescents has increased markedly, raising ethical concerns regarding body image, developmental suitability, and psychosocial risk. Individuals 19 and under experienced a 75% increase in neuromodulator injections and a 71% increase in hyaluronic acid fillers between 2019 and 2022. Social and commercial forces-including social media and targeted marketing-promote cosmetic intervention as routine self-optimization, despite adolescents' ongoing cognitive, emotional, and identity development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We focus on elective, nonmedically necessary procedures such as neuromodulators and fillers in individuals aged 13-19. We review ethical principles (autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice), psychosocial vulnerabilities (including body dysmorphic disorder [BDD]), social media influence, commercial pressures, and longitudinal mental health outcomes. Current regulatory guidance and professional society recommendations are assessed for gaps. RESULTS: Adolescents' emerging autonomy is developmentally incomplete, and appearance-based motivations are often transient and externally influenced. Longitudinal data link cosmetic procedures with higher depression, anxiety, and lower self-esteem. BDD affects ∼2% of adolescents, who rarely improve after intervention and may worsen. Social media exposure doubles the likelihood of considering cosmetic procedures, and commercial marketing further normalizes aesthetic ideals. Existing professional guidelines rarely mandate validated psychosocial screening, structured counseling, or cooling-off periods, leaving adolescents vulnerable to premature intervention. CONCLUSION: A standardized, multi-component ethical framework is necessary to guide clinicians caring for adolescents seeking elective aesthetic procedures. Recommendations include medical-necessity assessment, structured counseling, strengthened parental consent, validated BDD screening, and careful documentation with follow-up. Clear, evidence-informed ethical standards are essential to safeguard adolescent well-being and prioritize patient welfare over commercial interest.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Call for Ethical Guidelines in Cosmetic Dermatology for Adolescents. — 科研速览 Science Skim