科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Public Administration Review2026-02-12· Public administration

A Chequered History but Positive Future for British Public Administration

Ian C Elliott, Liz Richardson, Catherine Durose, Sarah A Ayres, John Boswell, Paul Cairney, Matthew Flinders, Steve Martin

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
ABSTRACT Public services, public servants, and the study of Public Administration are operating in a context of global turbulence. Our review of the state of the discipline suggests that a core strength of British Public Administration has been the complementarity between scholarship and practice, responding to existential threats. We analyze changing relationships between the discipline and practice in British public administration over three eras: Applied, fragmented, and impactful. The applied era saw mutual exchange, but a lack of criticality. The fragmented era was one of a retreat to over‐specialization and identity crises. The impactful era has tried to revivify synergies but has struggled for coherence and criticality. Looking to the future, the nascent sub‐field of Positive Public Administration is identified as providing an opportunity to radically redefine the scientific quality and social relevance of the discipline due to the way it blends constructive engagement with independent criticality.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

A Chequered History but Positive Future for British Public Administration — 科研速览 Science Skim