Karen Trister Grace, Elizabeth Miller, Elizabeth Tobin-Tyler
Restricting abortion access was twice as common as forced abortion, undermining legislative rationales for abortion restrictions.
OBJECTIVE: Reproductive coercion encompasses a range of partner behaviors that violate reproductive autonomy, including contraceptive sabotage, coercion to become pregnant, and controlling pregnancy outcome (i.e., forced continuation or termination). Coerced abortion is often cited as a reason to restrict abortion access. We examined data on the prevalence of reproductive coercion behaviors including abortion coercion.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 3199 people living in the United States and assigned male at birth, administered by Prolific, which measured lifetime use of 13 reproductive coercion behaviors.
RESULTS: Participants most commonly removed condoms without consent (13.1%) and refused to use condoms (8.8%). 2.0% of participants reported attempts to force abortion and 4.3% reported blocking abortion access.
CONCLUSION: Restricting abortion access was twice as common as forced abortion, undermining legislative rationales for abortion restrictions.