科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ The New phytologist2026-08-11

Extending the Farquhar-von Caemmerer-Berry photosynthesis model to account for various photorespiratory bypasses.

Xinyou Yin, Kaining Jin, Guoxin Chen, Tiegang Lu

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
The Farquhar-von Caemmerer-Berry model is used as the standard to investigate leaf photosynthetic CO2- and light-responses in plant physiology. The model was developed for C3 photosynthesis with the native photorespiratory cycle. However, it is also frequently used to parameterize photosynthesis of plants with synthetic photorespiratory bypasses. Here, we point out that this latter practice is not advised for two reasons. First, unlike the native photorespiratory cycle, synthetic bypasses alter amounts and location of photorespiratory CO2 release. Second, requirements for reductants and ATP are altered by bypass pathways. We extend the model to account for these changes. Estimates of both Vcmax (Rubisco carboxylation capacity) and Jmax (light-saturated linear electron transport rate) differ between original and extended models, and the difference is greater for Vcmax than for Jmax. Model analyses show that 17 bypasses reported so far perform contrastingly in terms of photosynthetic efficiency parameters (carboxylation efficiency and quantum yield) and photosynthetic capacity parameter (light-saturated photosynthetic rate). The amount rather than the location of photorespiratory CO2 release largely determines the benefit of bypasses. Full-decarboxylating bypasses, which have been claimed to act as a CO2-concentrating mechanism around Rubisco, are least efficient, whereas a carbon-fixing bypass is most promising for improving C3 photosynthesis.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Extending the Farquhar-von Caemmerer-Berry photosynthesis model to account for various photorespiratory bypasses. — 科研速览 Science Skim