科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Journal of the American Geriatrics Society2026-09-05

Best Case/Worst Case: A Multisite Randomized Trial of Scenario Planning for Patients With Late-Stage Kidney Disease.

Lily N Stalter, Bret M Hanlon, Kyle J Bushaw, Jenna Nitkowski, Anne Buffington, Katharine L Cheung, Amy B Zelenski, Kristine Kwekkeboom, Amar D Bansal, Deidra Candice Crews, Holly M Koncicki, Daniel Lam, Alvin H Moss, Maya K Rao, Dawn Felicity Wolfgram, Jeniann Yi, Carrie Brill, Tamara Isakova, Margaret L Schwarze

一句话结论 · In one sentence

Training nephrologists to use the BC/WC communication tool does not significantly affect receipt of palliative care or other measurable clinical outcomes.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Best Case/Worst Case (BC/WC) is a communication tool to support nephrologists and older adults with advanced chronic kidney disease with decisions about dialysis. We compared the effectiveness of training nephrologists to use BC/WC versus usual care on receipt of palliative care, quality of life (QOL), quality of communication, dialysis initiation, and death. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: From February 2021 to December 2023, we enrolled patients at 10 US sites who were ≥ 60 years, had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤ 24 mL/min/1.73m2, with estimated survival ≤ 18 months, and were considering dialysis initiation in the outpatient setting. We randomized nephrologists to intervention or usual care. METHODS: In this cluster randomized trial, we followed patients for up to 2 years using chart review and patient and caregiver surveys. The primary outcome was receipt of palliative care within 12 months of patient enrollment. RESULTS: We enrolled 68 nephrologists (36 intervention) and 268 patients (105 intervention). On intention-to-treat analysis, receipt of palliative care within 12 months did not significantly differ between groups (hazard ratio (HR) 0.94, 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 0.59-1.52; p = 0.812). Patients of intervention nephrologists were more likely to initiate dialysis (HR, 1.50, 95% CI, 1.00-2.25; p = 0.048) and report worse QOL throughout the study (FACIT-Pal effect estimate, -6.51; 95% CI, -12.20, -0.81; p = 0.025; FACT-G effect estimate, -4.78; 95% CI, -8.35, -1.22; p = 0.010). We found no significant differences in intensity of treatment at the end of life, quality of communication, or on-study death between groups. CONCLUSION: Training nephrologists to use the BC/WC communication tool does not significantly affect receipt of palliative care or other measurable clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04466865 (URL: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04466865), registered 07/07/2020.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Best Case/Worst Case: A Multisite Randomized Trial of Scenario Planning for Patients With Late-Stage Kidney Disease. — 科研速览 Science Skim