科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026-01-01

Cognitive function and eye movement patterns during reading tasks in older adults.

Haiwei Zuo, King Hann Lim, Heming Huang, Sivaraman Eswaran, Jonathan Then Sien Phang, Luping Song, Chenhui Zhang, Zhenjun Li, Hongming Huang

一句话结论 · In one sentence

The reading-task total score was strongly correlated with MMSE (r = 0.92, p < 0.001). Eye-tracking features showed significant group differences, with longer fixation duration, more ROI entries, more reading-order regressions, and larger saccade amplitude in cognitively impaired groups. The three-class combined model reached macro area under the curve (AUC) = 1.000, accuracy = 0.997, and macro F1 = 0.997; for MCI versus HC, eye-tracking-only and combined models reached AUC = 1.000 compared with AUC = 0.895 for the reading-task score alone.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
INTRODUCTION: Progressive cognitive decline associated with aging can be measured by observing alterations in eye movement behavior during reading. This study explores the association between eye movement profiles and cognitive performance in older adults during reading-based tasks in virtual reality. METHODS: Sixty older adults with Alzheimer's disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and healthy controls (HC) wore a virtual reality (VR) headset during a reading-based task. Recorded eye movements yielded four gaze features (F2-F5): fixation duration, region of interest (ROI) entry count, regression count, and saccade amplitude. With the reading-task total score (F1), these formed a five-feature set (F1-F5) for logistic regression under leakage-safe stratified 10-fold cross-validation. Concurrent validity was assessed against paper-based Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). RESULTS: The reading-task total score was strongly correlated with MMSE (r = 0.92, p < 0.001). Eye-tracking features showed significant group differences, with longer fixation duration, more ROI entries, more reading-order regressions, and larger saccade amplitude in cognitively impaired groups. The three-class combined model reached macro area under the curve (AUC) = 1.000, accuracy = 0.997, and macro F1 = 0.997; for MCI versus HC, eye-tracking-only and combined models reached AUC = 1.000 compared with AUC = 0.895 for the reading-task score alone. DISCUSSION: Integrating gaze features with the reading-task total score can improve cognitive assessment by capturing process-level information. Participants with AD and MCI exhibited longer fixation durations, more ROI entries, and more reading regressions than controls, with the largest effects in AD. The combined model showed its clearest value in the three-class setting.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Cognitive function and eye movement patterns during reading tasks in older adults. — 科研速览 Science Skim