科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Ecology Letters2026-03-01· Misinformation

There is No Consensus on Biological Sex

Madeline G. Eppley, Andy Lee, Robert Dellinger, Ally Swank

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
There is ongoing scientific and societal discourse on the definition of biological sex. At this critical moment when misinformation about sex is being applied to policy globally, scientific clarification is valuable. Here, we evaluate the primary approaches to defining sex and synthesise the active discourse to conclude that there is no current consensus on a definition of sex that is free of assumptions and limitations. While there is no current consensus, we do not advocate for a single definition and contend that a lack of unanimity is not inherently problematic. No matter what definitional choices are used, we provide actionable recommendations to improve accuracy when describing sex. Most importantly, regardless of scientific debates, no biological definition of sex should be used to dictate human rights.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

There is No Consensus on Biological Sex — 科研速览 Science Skim