科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology2026-08-17

Geometric standardized mean difference and its application to meta-analysis.

Jiandong Shi, Xiaochen Zhang, Lu Lin, Hiu Yee Kwan, Tiejun Tong

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
The standardized mean difference (SMD) is a widely used measure of effect size, particularly common in psychology, clinical trials and meta-analysis involving continuous outcomes. Traditionally, under the equal variance assumption, the SMD is defined as the mean difference divided by a common standard deviation. This approach is prevalent in meta-analysis but can be overly restrictive in clinical practice. To accommodate unequal variances, the conventional method averages the two variances arithmetically, which does not allow for an unbiased estimation of the SMD. Inspired by this, we propose a geometric approach to averaging the variances, resulting in a novel measure for standardizing the mean difference with unequal variances. We further propose the Cohen-type and Hedges-type estimators for the new SMD, and derive their statistical properties including the confidence intervals. Simulation results show that the Hedges-type estimator performs optimally across various scenarios, demonstrating lower bias, lower mean squared error and improved coverage probability. A real-world meta-analysis also illustrates that our new SMD and its estimators provide valuable insights to the existing literature and can be highly recommended for practical use.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Geometric standardized mean difference and its application to meta-analysis. — 科研速览 Science Skim