Shiho Kaneko, Kentaro Sawada, Kazuteru Hatanaka, Masayoshi Dazai, Hiroshi Nakatsumi, Takayuki Ando, Masahito Kotaka, Yasushi Tsuji, Michio Nakamura, Osamu Muto, Takashi Meguro, Takahiro Ishii, Atsushi Sato, Susumu Sogabe, Shintaro Sawaguchi, Tatsuya Yokoyama, Koichi Ishida, Kazuaki Harada, Yasuyuki Kawamoto, Satoshi Yuki, Naoya Sakamoto, Yu Sakata, Yoshito Komatsu
In patients with HER2-positive mCRC, first-line treatment efficacy appeared comparable between the anti-EGFR antibody and bevacizumab groups. Tmab+Per demonstrated modest activity, with greater benefit observed in patients with RAS wild-type and HER2 immunohistochemistry 3+ tumors. Appropriate patient selection and IRR management remain important.
BACKGROUND: In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive disease is a molecular subtype for targeted therapy; however, real-world data remain limited.
METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study of patients with HER2-positive mCRC diagnosed between 2010 and 2023 at 14 institutions in Japan was conducted. In patients with RAS wild-type tumors, outcomes were compared based on the molecular targeted agent (anti-epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] antibody or bevacizumab) combined with first-line chemotherapy. In patients treated with trastuzumab plus pertuzumab (Tmab+Per), outcomes and safety, with infusion-related reactions (IRRs) assessed.
RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included. In patients with RAS wild-type tumors, outcomes were comparable between the anti-EGFR antibody (n = 17) and bevacizumab (n = 9) groups (progression-free survival: 15.6 vs. 12.0 months; hazard ratio: 0.94, 95% confidence interval: 0.38-2.35, overall survival: 38.4 vs. 32.0 months; hazard ratio: 0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.30-2.74, p = 0.87). Twenty patients received Tmab+Per, with a median progression-free survival of 3.1 months and an objective response rate of 10%. Greater benefit was observed in patients with RAS wild-type and HER2 immunohistochemistry 3+ tumors (objective response rate 28.6%). IRRs occurred in 14.2% of patients receiving prophylactic antihistamines and 41.7% of those who did not (p = 0.35).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HER2-positive mCRC, first-line treatment efficacy appeared comparable between the anti-EGFR antibody and bevacizumab groups. Tmab+Per demonstrated modest activity, with greater benefit observed in patients with RAS wild-type and HER2 immunohistochemistry 3+ tumors. Appropriate patient selection and IRR management remain important.